<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Cable &#124; Gallagher Law</title>
	<link>http://www.cablegallagher.com</link>
	<description>Folsom Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>In Search of Compliance under Title II of the ADA</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The present status of disabled access in California&#8217;s cities and counties reminds me of an episode from Leonard Nimoy&#8217;s 1970&#8217;s series &#8220;In Search Of . . .&#8220;. I realize I may be dating myself, but the point I&#8217;m trying to make is very simple: whatever happened to Title II compliance?


In fairness, Title II compliance in [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.cablegallagher.com/2009/09/in-search-of-compliance-under-title-ii-of-the-ada/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Munson v. Del Taco &#8211; Why should a disabled plaintiff be required to prove intentional discrimination?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Left Coast Access Blog.
Let&#8217;s dive right in with the matter of Munson v. Del Taco, a case which is presently pending before the California Supreme Court.
Munson involves a mobility-disabled plaintiff who sued the Del Taco Corporation in federal district court under the ADA and California&#8217;s Unruh Civil Rights Act after he encountered [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.cablegallagher.com/2009/08/welcome/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
